I'm going to guess that's the source of the laughing that's been keeping people up at night. Not that I have any proof, it just seems like a ghost-like thing to do, going around cackling at night.
I've been going out to try to learn more about them, yes. Thus far when I try to approach, they disappear. However, the fact that they come back soon after I afford them some space is suspect.
The words of someone who’s never been invited to a ghost party.
Do you know what they’re the ghosts of? Because I suppose there’s no good option other than ‘people who died of old age after a long and happy life’, but I’m rather hoping the answer isn’t ‘the last batch of newcomers they found in a crater’.
Eyewitness accounts are varied, so there's no reliable conclusion yet. However, a number of the reports have suggested that the ghosts are childlike, and monstrous in nature. Which would also explain the laughing.
Wow. If you’re not invited to their parties, clearly the ghosts are missing out on stellar entertainment.
Young, mostly. Then the fact that it’s ‘ghosts’, plural. Then the possibility of them being something that might be able to rip my arms off and eat them. Mostly, I’m concerned about how so many children became dead.
And slightly concerned that they might have parents who may or may not also be ghosts and enthusiastic about ripping arms off. Who might be equally concerned about the dead children situation and ready to express that.
The fact that they've been reported as ghosts doesn't automatically mean they're the lingering spirits of deceased once-living mortals. It means that whoever perceived them and made the report interpreted their qualities to be ghostlike.
For all we know, they could be living energy beings who just happen to resemble what we think of as ghosts.
no subject
OoooooOOOOOooooooOOOOOOOOOOOOOooooo.
no subject
I'm going to guess that's the source of the laughing that's been keeping people up at night. Not that I have any proof, it just seems like a ghost-like thing to do, going around cackling at night.
no subject
no subject
Is death-ish the right term? ‘Morbid’ doesn’t fit. Necrotic seems appropriate, perhaps, aside from the existing medical meaning.
no subject
no subject
Are you suspicious just because you’re unpopular with ghosts, Bottle-chan?
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
Do you know what they’re the ghosts of? Because I suppose there’s no good option other than ‘people who died of old age after a long and happy life’, but I’m rather hoping the answer isn’t ‘the last batch of newcomers they found in a crater’.
no subject
Eyewitness accounts are varied, so there's no reliable conclusion yet. However, a number of the reports have suggested that the ghosts are childlike, and monstrous in nature. Which would also explain the laughing.
no subject
Childlike and monstrous. Both of those are concerning for entirely different reasons.
no subject
I'm curious which you find more concerning. Young, or inhuman?
no subject
Young, mostly. Then the fact that it’s ‘ghosts’, plural. Then the possibility of them being something that might be able to rip my arms off and eat them. Mostly, I’m concerned about how so many children became dead.
And slightly concerned that they might have parents who may or may not also be ghosts and enthusiastic about ripping arms off. Who might be equally concerned about the dead children situation and ready to express that.
no subject
For all we know, they could be living energy beings who just happen to resemble what we think of as ghosts.
no subject
Though I will admit, that would be far better than dead children.
no subject